I am Alice

Early in his book “Photographing the World Around You“, author Freeman Patterson tells the story of Alice, a participant in one of his workshops. It’s a bit too long to re-tell here, but later on he provides this summary:

Remember Alice, whom you met earlier; she had so little confidence in her personal creativity that she automatically assumed every picture she made was, at best, competent. In her view, non-creative people canmake only non-creative photographs and, since she regarded herself as having no imagination, she felt incapable of improving her seeing and her photographs very much.

I am Alice…but not as much as I used to be.

Can you spot the red car. Up your photography game using the red car theory

I just came across this YouTube video – from one of my favorite photographers/content creators. His name is Craig Roberts, and his channel is called E6. The video’s premise is that if, every time you go out to take photographs, you have a goal (e.g. as in this case red cars) in mind you will see red cars where otherwise you might not. You would see things that you otherwise might miss.

I’d agree with this…up to a point. Yes, you might well see things you would otherwise miss, but you might also miss equally or even more interesting photographic opportunities because you’re focusing so much on looking for your subject.

Maybe a way around this is to spend a morning focusing on a particular subject followed by an afternoon wandering around with no focus to see what you find? Or maybe spend one day on a particular subject and the next day just wander around?

A couple of interesting YouTube Channels

I recently discovered a couple of interesting photography-related YouTube channels

The first is by Joel Ulises. He describes his channel as: Sharing the work of photography masters. My YouTube channel was created to share the amazing work of photography masters. I hope my channel inspires and touches the hearts of everyone who checks it out. At the time I’m writing this his channel has 222 videos, each one covering a single well known (usually) photographer. Recent videos include: William A. Allard; Philippe Halsman; Raymond Depardon; and Jerry Schatzberg. If you like famous photographers, this is one for you.

The second channel is quite different. The channel is called Hunter Creates Things. The description reads: “Photographer and Filmmaker. Currently based out of Warsaw, he has lived in Auckland, Seoul, London, Jersey and briefly, in a remote village with an Alpaca and a Goat, neither of whom liked him very much. Forever torn between form and function, Hunter works as a fine artist, a street photographer, a mentor, a YouTuber, a DP, an editor, and as a (rather insufferable) writer. He also likes racing cars, scope creep, and fashion. He’d really like it if you got in touch, especially if you’re a new photographer, an academic, or just want to chat. That way, he knows for sure someone is listening, and he can stop referring to himself in the third person.” His channel contains all kinds of interesting stuff related to both still, and video photography. Recent offerings include: The Problem With TikTok Street Photographers; Going Full Time?; How To CURE Your Street Photography Anxiety; How Good Can An $80 Lens Really Be?; and Why Shoot Black & White In 2024?

Taken with a Sony DSC-H50

Trying to get to grips with the square aspect ratio

I have a few square format film cameras that I haven’t yet tried so I thought to try one of them. However, it occurred to me that I have only very limited experience with that format and there was a very real possibility that I would waste a lot of expensive film trying (and possibly failing) with a film camera.

So, I thought I’d practice with a digital camera. I knew that I had at least one digital camera that would allow me to see at 1:1 aspect ratio on screen: My 14-year-old Panasonic LX-3. But did I have something a bit more recent? Well, it turned out that I did. In fact, I had more than one. My Panasonic Lumix GX-85 and my Sony RX100 (and maybe others that I didn’t check) also did. Since the RX100 is very small and light I thought I’d take that.

So how did it go? Not surprisingly not that well. The RX100 shows you the 1:1 a2pect ratio in the viewfinder, but it doesn’t actually crop the image. Rather, when you bring the image into Lightroom it shows the full picture with the 1:1 crop superimposed. With almost all of the images I decided to reject the 1:1 crop and choose another one (e.g. 4×6) that I’m more familiar with. I guess I don’t’ yet see images with a 1:1 aspect ratio. I’ll have to practice more.

Taken with a Sony RX100 MIII

What’s with this stuff about pre-visualization?

I believe that this originates from Ansel Adams who said:

“In my mind’s eye, I visualize how a particular… sight and feeling will appear on a print. If it excites me, there is a good chance it will make a good photograph. It is an intuitive sense, an ability that comes from a lot of practice.”

I get that. That’s pretty much what I try to do with my photography. When I see something that interests me, I have a sense of how the final photograph should look. In effect, I visualize how the final image will look and do all I can to get it to look the way I visualized it.

What I don’t get is where the “pre” comes from. The prefix “pre” means something that comes before something else e.g. “The tree was almost certainly planted pre-1700.” or “She attended a pre-adolescent dance class.”

So “pre-visualize” would suggest something that you do before you “visualize”. What is that? Am I missing something?

I quickly browsed around the internet and couldn’t find a quotation where Adams uses “pre-visualize”, although I did find examples (such as the one above) where he does use “visualize”.

Admittedly, I didn’t spend much time looking so I might well have missed something. It was just a passing thought that I don’t really want to spend more effort on.