A New Lens: Laowa 85mm f5.6

I recently acquired a new lens. It’s a Laowa 85mm f5.6. I already have two lenses, so why not use one of them. Well, I have been using them and they don’t really meet my need.

My first macro lens was a 7Artisans 60mm f2.8. There’s a review of it here. Note that a newer version now available. Review here. I bought it because it was inexpensive, reputed to be quite sharp, and well made. I was just getting started with macro photography and didn’t to spend a lot in case I didn’t like it (as it turned out I did). I bought it to use with my then newly acquired Sony A6000. Unfortunately this combination didn’t work for me. The lens was everything I thought it would be, but it was also something I stupidly had not thought about: it’s heavy. Or at least it’s too heavy for me. It’s also very front heavy on the A6000. I should say that I have quite weak arms so this may not be a problem for others.

My second macro lens is an old Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm f2.8 macro. I like this lens a lot and use it mostly in manual focus mode. It’s quite small and light. There’s a review here. I enjoyed using it. So what’s the problem. Actually there are two: first it’s 50mm focal length means that I have to get very close to take a picture. Second it only works on my Sony A-mount (and of course Minolta film cameras) cameras. Nowadays I mostly use Sony E-mount cameras including the Sony A-6000 and my fairly recently acquired Sony A7IV. While writing the above I realize that I actually could use it with an adapter on the E-mount cameras. I’d lose the shot metadata and would have manual focus, but since usually use manual focus for macros that would be no great loss. You live and learn.

Anyway I bought the Laowa 85mm f5.6. It’s well made, smaller and lighter than the 7artisans and has a longer focal length than either of them allowing me to stand father back from my subjects. It also has something that neither of the other lenses has: a 2:1 magnification ratio rather than the 1:1 ration of the other two. You might think that the f5.6 minimum aperture is a limitation, but since I’m usually shooting around f8 with flash it really isn’t. I haven’t used it much yet, but so far I like it. There’s a review of it here.

Taken with a Fuji X-E3 and Fuji XC 16-50mm f3.5-5.6 OSS II

Optical Illusion

I had eaten lunch at a nearby Mexican Restaurant (Los Abuelos) and needed to use the men’s room. I was sitting there browsing on my iPhone (as you do) when I looked up. To my surprise my eyes briefly had difficulty focusing on the green tiled wall. After a second or two I realized what was going on: the tiles were in fact flat. But they were made of glass with a green background, which made them seem to be recessed. My eyes apparently had difficulty figuring out whether I was looking at a flat or recessed set of tiles and tried to switch between. It was a little unnerving.

Taken with an iPhone SE II

Misty Woodland

For a number of reasons (too cold, too wet, too gloomy, landscape too boring, volunteer work at the Briarcliff Manor-Scarborough Historical Society, no dog to force me to go out to walk etc. ) I haven’t been walking too much of late. Since I take most of my pictures while walking around this means that I haven’t taken too many pictures either.

However, a few days ago I awoke a little early to find warm temperatures and to my amazement – fog (we don’t get a lot of fog where I live). From all the YouTube videos I watch I’ve learned that fog/mist is just the thing for woodland photography as it hides a lot of the clutter that often spoils a woodland image.

So I hurriedly got up, got dressed, and went out to the nearest woodland. I should have gotten up earlier, as by the time I got there the mist had started to dissipate.

These are the results.








Taken with a Sony A7IV and Tamron Di III VXD A056SF 70-180mm f2.8.