Baking

A recent post on our Garden Club refers to my “baked goods”. This seems to have surprised certain members of my family so I’m going to tell a little story:

There’s a scene I like in a otherwise fairly mediocre movie called “Quigley down under”. In case you’re not familiar with it it’s a western set in Australia starring Tom Selleck. He’s travelling around with a kind of fancy sniper’s rifle taking up lost causes. The villain is played by Alan Rickman (what a surprise). Rickman is a pistol aficionado and Quigley is a thorn in his side. He particularly seems to resent Quigley’s skill with the rifle and the fact that Quigley says he never cared for pistols. So in the final climactic scene he traps Selleck and forces him into a gunfight with pistols. They draw and Quigley pulls out his pistol and shoots the Rickman character. As he lies there dying the Rickman character says something along the lines of “But I thought….” and Quigley replies “I said I never cared for them. Never said I couldn’t use them”.

It’s the same with my baking. I never much cared for baking, but that didn’t mean that I didn’t know how to.

I decided to do more baking after we had our flood down in Briarcliff last year. In cleaning up we came across a stand mixer that, because Mrs. Dale didn’t have any space for it in the kitchen, had disappeared into our storage room downstairs. So I thought I’d give it a try. Since then I’ve made pizza, bread of various kinds (in fact I have some bread dough rising as we speak – see final product above); cookies; fruit pies; quiches; savory pies, banana bread (for which I received compliments from Germaine Chandelier who for many years was one of NY’s pre-eminent caterers) and, my piece de resistance: strawberry coconut cheescake.

So yes I can, indeed, bake

Garden Tour

Every year the garden club (of which we are members) organizes visits to a number of gardens around the lake and this year we were one of six chosen. Of course they ask those who are chosen, but the other members of the garden club aren’t told until the day of the even when a flyer is handed out identifying the gardens and providing a brief description. This is what they said about us:

“Relatively new to the community, Eirah and Howard have become active members of the Garden Club. Howard’s photos in the calendar and delicious baked goods are both favorites with our members. Eirah has literally dug in and helped plant and the guide Girl Scouts with their planting. Gardening in pots is their very special talent. Enjoy the transformation of the property.”

Of course my wife was pleased to have been chosen and for the past few weeks she’s talked about nothing but gardening – that is when she’s not buying plants and otherwise tending to the garden itself. My role as usual was to dig holes, carry heavy stuff and generally clean up. Either side of the driveway is somewhat overgrown so I decided to attack that by trimming some of the junipers growing on the right side. Trimming didn’t seem to help much so I ended up cutting some of them down completely. We were surprised to see to very picturesque boulders hidden by the junipers. Since these looked nicer that the junipers I had to cut some more down. The problem is that I don’t have very good tools. A chain saw would have been helpful – but then again you can’t give me anything sharp. So I had to content myself with a pruning saw. Luckily junipers wood is soft so although it was hard work it was possible to cut even quite thick ones with the pruning saw. I have a few left which are just too thick, but I’ve cut them back drastically so they don’t cut off the view of the boulders too much. If I say myself it looks a lot better now.

The Garden Tour took place yesterday. People came to our house and we visited the other houses. All but one were on the lake and it was interesting to see the variety of views and the way people had organized their spaces to take advantage of their lake view. After the visit we convened for lunch (paid for by our Garden Club dues) at one of the member’s houses. I guess there must have been sixty or so people there. A good time was had by all.

Now it’s all over and I can relax a bit….I hope….at least for a while.

Another Garden Club member was taking pictures of the assembled multitude so I decided to focus on things in the gardens:




Weekly Discussions on Photo.net

The Style Essentials–Marlene Dietrich’s Key Light in 1932’s SHANGHAI EXPRESS

I’m a regular reader of photo.net forums, particularly ‘Classic Manual Cameras’ and ‘Casual Photo Conversations’. The latter has a weekly series of discussions – each one devoted to a single iconic photograph. Over time I’ve missed a few of them and I find the series so interesting that I thought I’d compile a list (with links) of the entire series. Then I’ll be able to read them at my leisure. The rationale given in the original post launching the series was:

Would anyone be interested in a regular discussion, perhaps each week or every other week, about a well-known photo or a lesser-known photo by a well-known photographer? Recently, there was a potentially good discussion in the Philosophy forum about one of Eugene Smith’s photos. The Philosophy forum may not have been the best place for this for a couple of reasons. One, I don’t think it gets that much traffic (or at least participation), which is understandable. Two, it may not have really been a philosophical issue.

It struck me that a discussion like that each week might be good (and fun) for folks at PN. It could evolve however the participants want. I wouldn’t necessarily see it as a critique session, though it could be that in part. It could also just be comments about the photo, how it fits into the overall body of work of the photographer, or its place historically, or something about it technically, or whatever people want to say about it. Questions could be asked and answered about it as well…/more

The latest is number 30: Charles Marville, “Place Saint-André-des-Arts (Sixth Arrondissement), 1865—1868”. Unfortunately I haven’t yet been able to find #13. I’ll try to keep this listing up to date as new posts are added.

Portrait of Marlene Dietrich — WEEKLY DISCUSSION #1.
Alli, Annie, Hannah, and Berit — WEEKLY DISCUSSION # 2.
Schaffers Crossing Roundhouse, O. Winston Link — WEEKLY DISCUSSION # 3.
The Flatiron Building–Eduard Steichen Weekly Discussion #4.
Big Cypress National Preserve 1: WEEKLY DISCUSSION #5.
Kertész’s “Chez Mondrian” : WEEKLY DISCUSSION #6.
Edgerton “.30 Bullet Piercing an Apple” : WEEKLY DISCUSSION #7.
Eisenstaedt – Drum Major at the University of Michigan – WEEKLY DISCUSSION #8.
Leibing – Leap Into Freedom – WEEKLY DISCUSSION #9.
Henri Cartier-Bresson: “Hyères, 1932” WEEKLY DISCUSSION #10.
Sam Haskins, “In the Studio” Weekly Discussion #11.
Suzanne Heintz – Life Once Removed – WEEKLY DISCUSSION #12.
Eisenstaedt – Children at a Puppet Show, 1963 – WEEKLY DISCUSSION #14.
Vivian Maier – 1954. New York, NY – WEEKLY DISCUSSION # 15.
I. Russel Sorgi – 1942 WEEKLY DISCUSSION #16.
William Mortensen – WEEKLY DISCUSSION #17.
Pablo Casals, 1954, by Yousuf Karsh – WEEKLY DISCUSSION #18.
Untitled Photography by Henri Brassai: His Secret Paris – Weekly Discussion #19.
Masahisa Fukase “The Solitude of Ravens” – Weekly Discussion #20.
WEEKLY DISCUSSION #21 Elliott Erwitt “Segregated Water Fountains”.
Saigon Execution photographed by Eddie Adams, 1968: WEEKLY DISCUSSION #22.
WEEKLY DISCUSSION #23: Duane Michals – singing women / singing men.
WEEKLY DISCUSSION #24 W. Eugene Smith’s 1948 photo essay: Country Doctor.
WEEKLY DISCUSSION #25 Edward Burtynsky Water Project.
WEEKLY DISCUSSION #26: Minor White. Capitol Reef, 1962..
WEEKLY DISCUSSION # 27 – Hill and Adamson – Scottish Fishwives, Washaday Group.- c1843.
WEEKLY DISCUSSION #28: Charles C. Ebbets “Lunch Atop a Skyscraper”.
WEEKLY DISCUSSION #29: Joe Rosenthal – “Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima”.
WEEKLY DISCUSSION #30: Charles Marville, “Place Saint-André-des-Arts (Sixth Arrondissement), 1865—1868”.
WEEKLY DISCUSSION No.31 – Winston Churchill Portraits by Yousuf Karsh.
WEEKLY DISCUSSION #32: A Hard Day’s Night by photographer Astrid Kirchherr.
Weekly Discussion #33: Elliot Erwitt
Weekly Discussion #34: “American Gothic, Washington DC” by Gordon Parks
Weekly Discussion #35: “Two Nuns” by A. Aubrey Bodine
Weekly Discussion #36: “The Kiss” by Joan Fontcuberta
WEEKLY DISCUSSION #37 Ken Heyman Photos.

WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #1 – Bill Brandt.
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #2 – Philip-Lorca diCorcia
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #3 – Truman Capote x 3
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #4 – Harry Callahan (color)
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #5 – Aleksandr Rodchenko
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #6 – Cole Weston
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #7 – Werner Mantz
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #8 – Martin Parr
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #9 – Francesca Woodman
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #10 – Nicholas Nixon
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #11 – David LaChapelle
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #12 – Eikoh Hosoe
WEEKLY DISCUSSION 2.0 #13 – Imogen Cunningham

A Few More Flowers

I’ve not been getting out much lately, my major activities being cooking, watching the World Cup and walking the dog. Often the only picture worthy opportunities are flowers – so here are a few more.

I like the one above because the flower (I’ve no idea what it is) seems to float with no visible means of support.

Flower pictures are often taken from the same angle i.e. from above, looking down on the flower. Here I tried a different angle – getting lower and looking up at the flower. It’s partially successful. I like the angle, but would have liked it to have had a bit more depth of field.

This is the same flower as the one above. It seems to produce two flowers at the same time: the larger white petals and the denser clusters of small yellow blossoms. I liked the contrast.

Some kind of daisy?

Don’t know what this is.